American Politics and Foreign Policy Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words

American Politics and Foreign Policy - Essay ExampleThe concluding section will draw upon all of this information and the world(prenominal) arguments will be considered when making a finalization about the matter.In April this year, Vladimir Putin announced that Russia will consider withdrawing from atomic number 63s key arms control treaty in response to United States plans to install missile defense governing bodys in Eastern atomic number 63 (Danilova, 2007). The Conventional Forces in Europe Treaty, which was signed in the last a hardly a(prenominal)(prenominal) months of the Cold War, has been considered as the foundation of stability in Europe. It places limits on the number of conventional weapons and foreign forces that can be deployed among member nations (Navosti, 2007). This particular aspect provides the keystone to the matter.In the first indication that the United States was losing patience with Moscows inflexibility on the issue, Condoleezza Rice, the secretary of state, described Russias fears simply as ludicrous (Columbia Tribune, 2007). The Russians have thousands of warheads, she told a conspire conference in Oslo prior to a NATO meeting. The idea that somehow you can stop the Russian strategic nuclear deterrent with a few interceptors just doesnt make sense (Columbia Tribune, 2007).Mr. ... Mr. Putin say he had decided to declare a moratorium on an updated version of the treaty because NATO powers had failed to ratify it (Danilova, 2007). The United States and its NATO allies said they would not ratify the treaty until Russia withdrew its troops from Moscow-backed seceding republics in Georgia and Moldova - an argument the Russian Kremlin dismisses as a pretext to allow Washington to boost its legions presence in Eastern Europe (Navosti, 2007).Background on the TreatyNegotiated and signed during the final years of the Cold War, the Conventional Armed Forces in Europe Treaty is often referred to as the cornerstone of European security (Crawford, 2002). According to the Reuters Fact box (2007) the treaty, signed on November 19, 1990, eliminated the Soviet Unions overwhelming quantitative reward in conventional weapons in Europe by setting equal limits on the amount of tanks, armored combat vehicles, heavy artillery, combat aircraft, and attack helicopters that NATO and the origin capital of Poland Pact could deploy between the Atlantic Ocean and the Ural Mountains (Crawford, 2002). Designed to prevent either alliance from concentrating forces for launching a blitzkrieg-type offensive, the treaty employs a system of concentric zones mandating smaller deployments of tanks, ACVs, and artillery the closer one moves toward the center of Europe (FAS, 1999). While the threat of such an offensive all but disappeared with the breakup of the Warsaw Pact and the dissolution of the Soviet Union, the CFE Treatys weapons limits and inspection regime, which provides an unprecedented degree of transparency on military holdings, continue to play an important role in Europe (FAS, 1999). CFE states-parties overhauled the treaty in November 1999,